The Letter on the Google Walkout Medium Account
The letter reads that Dr. Gebru’s dismissal has been framed as a resignation. However, in Dr. Gebru’s own words, she did not resign. The letter also says that Gebru asked for various conditions to be met so she could stay at Google, including transparency around the individuals who wanted her paper retracted. The leaders of the ethical AI team said they were unable to meet these conditions and accepted her resignation.
The letter that led to Gebru’s resignation detailed potential risks associated with the big language processing models, including over-relying on data from many wealthy countries that have more access to the Internet.
Gebru was planning to present the paper at a computer science conference in March 2021, but on October 7th, she submitted it for review at Google. It was approved shortly after, on October 8th.
Dean said that the research team required two weeks for review; however, this specific paper was only shared with a day’s notice before its deadline.
The Battle Is Not Over
The story is far from over, though, as Gebru’s team is pushing back on this assessment. They say that the review policy is meant to be flexible, and most employees do not follow the structures laid out by Jeff Dean. The team collected data showing most approvals of the resignation happened before the deadline, and 41 percent happened after the deadline.
More than 1,500 employees are protesting against Gebru’s dismissal, signing a Google Walkout Petition.